|
|
For the dissections of the regular polygon {n} for even n greater than or equal to 14 then there is a formula for the number of pieces. For n over 40 and when n is a multiple of 12 or 16, then it is possible to improve slightly on this.
For n from 14 to 40 the formula is: ⌊n/4⌋+6
For n from 42 to 124 an additional two pieces are required: ⌊n/4⌋+8
The general formula is: ⌊n/4⌋+2⌊log3(n/14)⌋+6.
n | Pieces |
---|---|
14 to 40 | ⌊n/4⌋+6 |
42 to 124 | ⌊n/4⌋+8 |
126 to 376 | ⌊n/4⌋+10 |
378 to 1132 | ⌊n/4⌋+12 |
1134 to 3400 | ⌊n/4⌋+14 |
This new dissection is unusual in that there are aligned edges of the square and the hexagon. I found this dissection after finding the more complex dissection of the square and heptagon. The hexagon strip can be formed in a variety of ways. The trick is to form it the correct way so that when the two strips are overlaid, a hexagon edge coincides with a square edge, hence saving a piece.
The dissection is translational.
This dissection uses the method of completed tessellations. This dissects a square with a small square to an octagon with the same small square.
This dissection first appeared in the circa 1300AD anonymous Persian manuscript “Interlocks of Similar or Complementary Figures”.
This is a PP dissection that uses a variable decagon strip. The two overlays show the strips before and after the modification of the decagon strip that saves a piece.
I like this dissection, although it has some odd shaped pieces.
This dissection uses the method of overlaid tessellations.
Discovered by Harry Lindgren (1951).
This dissection is within a family of even sided dissections that continues up to the {40}.
The piece has a leftward pointing spike near its top. It would nice to find an alternative dissection without this blemish.
This is the smallest n other than 12 for which a dissection of {4} to {n} has been found in less than or equal to n/2 pieces.
This is the smallest n for which a dissection of {4} to {n} has been found in less than n/2 pieces.
The piece at the top left of the square has a very thin downward spike along the left edge of the square. The angle at the tip of this spike is less than a tenth of a degree. (This means that the left edge of the shaded piece is not quite vertical). Also there is a very short edge at the far right end of the same piece. Neither of these features can easily be seen even at high magnification.
This dissection is the first within a family of even sided dissections that continues up to about {124}.
This is the first of a family of dissections of {n} when n is a multiple of 12.
Note that the two lines that appear to cross at left of centre of the 54-gon do not in fact do so.
This is the first of a family of dissections of {n} when n is 8 more than a multiple of 16.
This dissection was the first that I found that improved on the formula given at the top of this page. It is a shame that it relies on turning over a piece.
This is the smallest n for which a dissection of {4} to {n} has been found in less than or equal to n/3 pieces. The first dissection to require less than n/3 pieces is expected to be the dissection of the {88} in 29 pieces.
If pieces are not allowed to be turned over, then this is the smallest n for which a dissection of {4} to {n} has been found in less than or equal to n/3 pieces. The first dissection to be in less than n/3 pieces is expected to be the dissection of the {94} in 31 pieces.
Note that there is a thin spike at the top left of the piece at the bottom left corner of the square.